ManMadeMoonDuncan Jones
@Wolven maybe some Peter Singer's "Practical Ethics." Most of my pet theories on the future of sentient machines based on that book.
WolvenDamien
…before now. Glad I Do know it now. Honestly though, I can't be surprised, look at your considerations of human minds. @Wolven @ManMadeMoon
WolvenDamien
@ManMadeMoon I use a modified version of Singer's Ethics of Personhood. Modified because his concerns tend to rest w/ non-human a
Animals…
WolvenDamien
.@strixus Yes! Precisely correct! A theme which I use, whenever I write about our duties to non-human consciousnesses. There's a corrolary…
ManMadeMoonDuncan Jones
@Wolven heady tweets! My time at grad school was spent trying to knit together a moral platform using Singer and Daniel Dennett's work.
ManMadeMoonDuncan Jones
@Wolven the idea being, we should feel out the moral obligations now, before we find ourselves with sentient machines & no guidelines.
WolvenDamien
.@ManMadeMoon 3 things: 1) YES! THANK you! 2) If you get a chance, check the pdf I sent you. Deals w/ Exactly this 3) I wanna buy you lunch.
strixusstrixus
@Wolven one of the few truly salvageable things from Kant's Metaphysics of Morals is the instance that morality apply to all rational agents