mathowieMatt Haughey
I agree w/ @Cruftbox, @benbrown nails why SXSWi is out of control big and crazy these days (and why I'm home instead): ilovebenbrown.com/post/190065498…
benbrownBen Brown
@zeldman money changing the web is fine and inevitable - but at SXSW it used to be our money and is now their money. Pros and cons for both.
mathowieMatt Haughey
@benbrown @zeldman for me it's not about the money but the size, spectacle. If a conf gets so big I can't find my friends, I don't go.
waxpancakeAndy Baio
@mathowie @benbrown @zeldman Agreed. My favorite part of SXSW was always the serendipity, and that's been lost for me as it's grown.
jmcnallyJames McNally
.@benbrown well-put. I guess intro/extroversion is a scale. How large does the crowd have to be before each of us feels that way?
zeldmanJeffrey Zeldman
@benbrown in 1999 it was Razorfish's money. That sucked too. There's always been a garish commercial sideshow alongside good indy content.
benbrownBen Brown
Yes, @zeldman, but Razorfish made websites. Amex makes debt. Is SXSW the product that we consume, or are we the product SXSW sells to Amex?