shaver Mike Shaver
Did Chrome ever actually drop H.264? I haven't seen anything since the blog post 13 months (!) ago.

February 24, 2012     6 retweets #

BrendanEich BrendanEich
@shaver Not yet. If/when, NBD because content authors put Flash fallback inside <video>, and Chrome has a "special" Flash deal from Adobe...

February 24, 2012 #

shaver Mike Shaver
@BrendanEich yeah, and it looks like B2G will support H.264 as well, so to the extent that mobile is the future, open codecs probably aren't

February 24, 2012 #

BrendanEich BrendanEich
@shaver We have to play in order to place or win, but we're playing the longer game (Broadway.js is a first move) too.

February 24, 2012     1 retweets #

shaver Mike Shaver
@BrendanEich yep, I remember having this discussion about desktop video; I was likely on the wrong side of history

February 24, 2012 #

raccettura Robert Accettura
@shaver afaik no… nor did Adobe add WebM to Flash #emptypromises

February 24, 2012 #

shaver Mike Shaver
@raccettura I may have been the only person on the stage talking about WebM that didn't turn out to be lying!

February 24, 2012 #

raccettura Robert Accettura
@shaver I'm shocked. I've been told I'm cynical… I like to call it "experienced".

February 24, 2012 #

wesbos Wes Bos
@shaver Still works on chrome, wouldn't mind if they dropped it for just webm

February 24, 2012 #

atopal Kadir Topal
@shaver nope. Still nothing.

February 24, 2012 #

mpopp75 Markus Popp
@shaver you are right. It's still there. Apparently was just a bubble.

February 24, 2012 #

andreasgal andreasgal
@shaver Chrome never dropped H.264. Their slogan seems to have morphed into "Say you don't do evil."

February 24, 2012     3 retweets #