timoreilly
Tim O'Reilly
@DarrellIssa If you're so interested in openness, why did you author HR 3699, which prevents open access to federally funded research?
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly hey Tim. Not in front of a comp now but I'll tweet you in a little bit w/ the background.
@timoreilly hey Tim. Not in front of a comp now but I'll tweet you in a little bit w/ the background.
tradeglobex
Grain Broker
@DarrellIssa @timoreilly @IamTheWindowMan You're busy filing HOLDER's IMPEACHMENT PAPERS, right Mr. Issa?
@DarrellIssa @timoreilly @IamTheWindowMan You're busy filing HOLDER's IMPEACHMENT PAPERS, right Mr. Issa?
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly Tim, I'm firmly committed to open, accessible federally funded research. #opendata #openscience
@timoreilly Tim, I'm firmly committed to open, accessible federally funded research. #opendata #openscience
indyK1ng
indyK1ng
@DarrellIssa I think what @timoreilly is looking for is how that bill supports #openscience
@DarrellIssa I think what @timoreilly is looking for is how that bill supports #openscience
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly I understand your question, but HR 3699 does nothing to cut off access to federal funded research data. #opendata #openscience
@timoreilly I understand your question, but HR 3699 does nothing to cut off access to federal funded research data. #opendata #openscience
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly we included this to protect #openscience & #opendata: "...does not include progress reports or raw data outputs..."
@timoreilly we included this to protect #openscience & #opendata: "...does not include progress reports or raw data outputs..."
BennyMisfit
Ben R. Murray
@DarrellIssa More than enough information to have Obama impeached. What's up with these cowards in congress?
@DarrellIssa More than enough information to have Obama impeached. What's up with these cowards in congress?
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly what NIH currently does is post the final pre-publication draft, which is intellectual property, of a scholarly journal
@timoreilly what NIH currently does is post the final pre-publication draft, which is intellectual property, of a scholarly journal
jenniferwaller
Jen Waller
@DarrellIssa @timoreilly It's not the journal's intellectual prop. Authors hold copyright until they sign (& hopefully amend) pub agreement.
@DarrellIssa @timoreilly It's not the journal's intellectual prop. Authors hold copyright until they sign (& hopefully amend) pub agreement.
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly it's like a reporter writing a story about one of our hearings. the committee does the work, available to everyone for free...
@timoreilly it's like a reporter writing a story about one of our hearings. the committee does the work, available to everyone for free...
michael_nielsen
michael_nielsen
@DarrellIssa Your analogy is not correct: the scientists are doing the work of _both_ the committee and the reporter... (cc @timoreilly )
@DarrellIssa Your analogy is not correct: the scientists are doing the work of _both_ the committee and the reporter... (cc @timoreilly )
DarrellIssa
Darrell Issa
@timoreilly ...but the reporter's publication has the right to determine how the article disseminated.
@timoreilly ...but the reporter's publication has the right to determine how the article disseminated.
arihersh
Ari Hershowitz
Thoughtful response from @DarrellIssa to @timoreilly comments on HR 3699 Where does #open end and #ip start for gov-backed work?
Thoughtful response from @DarrellIssa to @timoreilly comments on HR 3699 Where does #open end and #ip start for gov-backed work?
timoreilly
Tim O'Reilly
@DarrellIssa Several thoughts: 1) What @michaelneilsen said. 2) the NIH policy you appear to be targeting gives journals a 1 year exclusive
@DarrellIssa Several thoughts: 1) What @michaelneilsen said. 2) the NIH policy you appear to be targeting gives journals a 1 year exclusive
timoreilly
Tim O'Reilly
@DarrellIssa That being said, @scholarlykitchn suggests that even better would be to require release of research reports
@DarrellIssa That being said, @scholarlykitchn suggests that even better would be to require release of research reports
timoreilly
Tim O'Reilly
@DarrellIssa ...suggest you think about how to proactively support open science. Forward-thinking journals don't need your protection.
@DarrellIssa ...suggest you think about how to proactively support open science. Forward-thinking journals don't need your protection.